Kelly Stoltz Email & Phone Number | Kelly L. Stoltz focuses her practice on the representation of primary and excess liability insurers in insurance coverage and bad faith litigation. She has litigated insurance-related disputes before state and federal courts throughout the country. REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS Columbia Cas. Co. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., No. BC402657 (Cal. Super. Oct. 26, 2011) Jury verdict obtained in favor of excess insurers against a claim for failure to settle within policy limits. Jury found that insurers did not act in bad faith in rejecting settlement demands in underlying personal injury lawsuit, which ultimately resolved for 32 million. Waste Mgmt. Recycle Am., Inc. v. Shawn Lavin, No. 2-11-0180 (Ill. Ct. App. May 13, 2011) After a five-day bench trial and subsequent appeal to the Illinois Court of Appeals established the validity of a covenant not to compete in the employment contract of a former senior level executive of our client. Advanced Envtl. Recycling Techs., Inc. v. Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 399 F. App’x 869 (5th Cir. 2010) Fifth Circuit affirmed district court’s grant of summary judgment, finding that a class action settlement for defective mold resistant decking was not an “occurrence” and held that umbrella policy did contain a “your product exclusion,” which precluded coverage for the settlement. Gallina v. Commerce & Indus. Ins., 375 F. App’x 935 (11th Cir. 2010) Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment finding that claimant’s attempt to enforce a 7-million consent judgment entered without the insurers’ consent breached the policy terms. The claimant also sought 70 million in punitive damages for bad faith. Both courts found that the insurer did not commit bad faith in the handling of the claim.

Kelly Stoltz

Kelly L. Stoltz focuses her practice on the representation of primary and excess liability insurers...
Chicago, Chicago, United States

*50 free lookup(s) per month.

No credit card required.

Kelly Stoltz’s Email kstoltz@nicolaidesllp.com

Kelly Stoltz’s Phone Numbers

Get KELLY’s Phone Number (For Free)

Social Media

Kelly Stoltz’s Location Chicago, Chicago, United States

Kelly Stoltz’s Current Industry Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan

Kelly Stoltz’s Prior Industry Bates Carey Nicolaides | Bollinger Ruberry And Garvey

Not the Kelly Stoltz you were looking for?

Find accurate emails & phone numbers for over 700M professionals.

Work Experience

Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan

Partner

2014-01-01 00:00:00 - Present

Bates Carey Nicolaides

Associate

2007-03-01 00:00:00 - 2013-12-01 00:00:00

Bollinger Ruberry And Garvey

Associate

2005-01-01 00:00:00 - 2007-01-01 00:00:00

Skills

No Skills Available

Languages

No Languages Available

FAQ About Kelly Stoltz

Kelly Stoltz is located at
Chicago, Chicago, United States

Kelly Stoltz is a Kelly L. Stoltz focuses her practice on the representation of primary and excess liability insurers in insurance coverage and bad faith litigation. She has litigated insurance-related disputes before state and federal courts throughout the country. REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS Columbia Cas. Co. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., No. BC402657 (Cal. Super. Oct. 26, 2011) Jury verdict obtained in favor of excess insurers against a claim for failure to settle within policy limits. Jury found that insurers did not act in bad faith in rejecting settlement demands in underlying personal injury lawsuit, which ultimately resolved for 32 million. Waste Mgmt. Recycle Am., Inc. v. Shawn Lavin, No. 2-11-0180 (Ill. Ct. App. May 13, 2011) After a five-day bench trial and subsequent appeal to the Illinois Court of Appeals established the validity of a covenant not to compete in the employment contract of a former senior level executive of our client. Advanced Envtl. Recycling Techs., Inc. v. Am. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 399 F. App’x 869 (5th Cir. 2010) Fifth Circuit affirmed district court’s grant of summary judgment, finding that a class action settlement for defective mold resistant decking was not an “occurrence” and held that umbrella policy did contain a “your product exclusion,” which precluded coverage for the settlement. Gallina v. Commerce & Indus. Ins., 375 F. App’x 935 (11th Cir. 2010) Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment finding that claimant’s attempt to enforce a 7-million consent judgment entered without the insurers’ consent breached the policy terms. The claimant also sought 70 million in punitive damages for bad faith. Both courts found that the insurer did not commit bad faith in the handling of the claim.

Kelly Stoltz currently works in the Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan |

No Languages Available

Kelly Stoltz has prior
experience in the following industries:
Bates Carey Nicolaides | Bollinger Ruberry And Garvey

Kelly Stoltz has the following professional experience:
Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan | Bates Carey Nicolaides | Bollinger Ruberry And Garvey